Home Ownership Tips from Team Dunlop, Toronto Real Estate
Don't "Fall" into the Season Without Preparing Your Home
Getting your home ready for the cooler weather in Toronto
Proper maintenance of your home and garden will help preserve your investment. And best of all, keeping your house in tip-top shape this fall will prevent any unnecessary chores in the spring.
Outdoor Projects
- Complete exterior painting before cooler weather arrives
- Check and repair exterior lighting before daylight fades
- Store lawn ornaments and patio furniture in a shed or basement. If space is limited, weather-resistant covers can protect outdoor furnishings
- Cover air conditioner and barbecue to prevent winter damage
- Close your pool before leaves start to fall, and nighttime temperatures begin to drop. Sooner than that and you risk an algae bloom
- Store kids toys indoors or in an outdoor shed to prevent rusting and fading
Lawn & Garden
- Till and prepare planting beds when the soil is relatively dry. By adding soil and mulch to your beds, you'll be a step ahead for spring planting
- Plant spring blooming bulbs and perennials
- Protect roses, saplings and small trees by sheltering them with a burlap screen
- Pull weeds to reduce the number of seedlings next spring
- Mow grass short for the final cut of the year by reducing the cutting height gradually to 3.5 cm (from 7.4 cm) until the grass stops growing
Indoor Preparation
- Bring container plants indoors, making sure they are free of pests. Doing so may enable plants to survive the season and bloom again in spring
- Check and clean your humidifier. Empty the tank, dry the inside surfaces and refill with clean water. Be sure to follow the manufacturer's instructions
For more tips on home ownership from Chris Dunlop, Broker and Lesley Patterson, Sales Representative - sign up at www.chrisdunlop.ca
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
FREE SEMINAR, Estate Planning
Aspire for the best... And plan for the worst...
HAVE A PLAN - GET A WILL!
Please join me for this special presentation.
Ever wonder what will happen to your home if you die? Who will raise your children? What would happen if your parents passed away and they had no will? OR what do you do if there was a will and you were the executor?
These are unquestionably unpleasant questions. However not nearly as unpleasant as your loved ones trying to sort things out if you pass away without a plan and a will
Once we have loved one's, assets and children it is wise to have a plan and a will. A simple estate plan does not take much time or cost much money - it can be quite simple really. Not having one can be a nightmare and will be costly.
As part of my value added services as a realtor I'm pleased to invite you to join me for a complimentary presentation - question and answer session and to help you tackle this uncomfortable topic.
Seating is limited and available on a first come first served basis.
REGISTER TODAY!
Hosted by Chris Dunlop, Real Estate Broker, Royal LePage Estate Realty
Presented by Denise Branton, LLP Estate Planning Lawyer, Carnevale Law Offices
HAVE A PLAN - GET A WILL!
Please join me for this special presentation.
Ever wonder what will happen to your home if you die? Who will raise your children? What would happen if your parents passed away and they had no will? OR what do you do if there was a will and you were the executor?
These are unquestionably unpleasant questions. However not nearly as unpleasant as your loved ones trying to sort things out if you pass away without a plan and a will
Once we have loved one's, assets and children it is wise to have a plan and a will. A simple estate plan does not take much time or cost much money - it can be quite simple really. Not having one can be a nightmare and will be costly.
As part of my value added services as a realtor I'm pleased to invite you to join me for a complimentary presentation - question and answer session and to help you tackle this uncomfortable topic.
Seating is limited and available on a first come first served basis.
REGISTER TODAY!
Hosted by Chris Dunlop, Real Estate Broker, Royal LePage Estate Realty
Presented by Denise Branton, LLP Estate Planning Lawyer, Carnevale Law Offices
Friday, March 11, 2011
Be Alarmed!
Day light savings is upon us and fire safety experts suggest this is the time of year to put new batteries in your fire alarms. Following are some tips to keep in mind.A short, low beep every 60 seconds indicates the battery power is low and the battery needs replacing. Change your smoke alarm batteries every 12 months or at the end of daylight saving, and use a long-lasting alkaline battery.
Smoke alarms should be tested monthly by pressing the test button
with a broom handle.
Smoke alarms should be vacuumed regularly - at a minimum once a year to clean the vents.
Powered smoke alarms, such as those in condominiums and newer homes, also have back-up batteries - check with the manufacturer if your model has batteries that need to be replaced regularly or whether it has a re-chargeable battery. If the electricity goes out in a fire... you'll be glad you did!
Fire Services recommend you change your smoke alarm (both battery powered and 240v hard-wired types) after ten years as it may start to fail after this period. A year of manufacture date is displayed on all smoke alarms.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
It's a wrap
Another year come and gone - The Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB)announced that 2010 ended up as the third best year for existing home sales... it was however not a typical year following traditional patterns for sales.
Following is a brief synopsis of the year just passed.
The December 2010 Market Watch from TREB Revealed a balanced market at year end. Prices overall in 2010 were up 9% compared to 2009. However we began the year generally up 20%, compared to the lows from the recession and generally ended the year up about 5% compared to year earlier periods.
Sales volumes were very high in the first part of the year with very low inventories. Sales volumes then tailed of dramatically during the summer as a result of mortgage rule changes, consumer concerns about increasing mortgage rates and confusion over the HST.
As fall approached it became clear interest rates remained at historic lows, that the HST did not impact the cost of buying in any substantial way and buyers returned to the market. The inventory of available homes remained steady but did not increase dramatically provinding an overall foundation for the market. As a result most of the fall was a balanced market with prices moving sideways and were generally 5% higher than fall 2009. Properly prepared, priced and marketed properties continued to sell, however by year end the Average days on market had increased to 37 from the year earlier period of just 27 days. With multiple offer scenarior's being the exception rather than the rule Realtor's and Sellers had to adjust their expectations on what and how long it took for even the best properties to sell.
Overall 2010 was an excellent year for real estate and has established a sustainable trend for the year ahead. Next post i'll offer up my thoughts for the year ahead and why the next couple of months may be the ideal time to sell.
Following is a brief synopsis of the year just passed.
The December 2010 Market Watch from TREB Revealed a balanced market at year end. Prices overall in 2010 were up 9% compared to 2009. However we began the year generally up 20%, compared to the lows from the recession and generally ended the year up about 5% compared to year earlier periods.
Sales volumes were very high in the first part of the year with very low inventories. Sales volumes then tailed of dramatically during the summer as a result of mortgage rule changes, consumer concerns about increasing mortgage rates and confusion over the HST.
As fall approached it became clear interest rates remained at historic lows, that the HST did not impact the cost of buying in any substantial way and buyers returned to the market. The inventory of available homes remained steady but did not increase dramatically provinding an overall foundation for the market. As a result most of the fall was a balanced market with prices moving sideways and were generally 5% higher than fall 2009. Properly prepared, priced and marketed properties continued to sell, however by year end the Average days on market had increased to 37 from the year earlier period of just 27 days. With multiple offer scenarior's being the exception rather than the rule Realtor's and Sellers had to adjust their expectations on what and how long it took for even the best properties to sell.
Overall 2010 was an excellent year for real estate and has established a sustainable trend for the year ahead. Next post i'll offer up my thoughts for the year ahead and why the next couple of months may be the ideal time to sell.
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Beautiful Balance
Earlier today the Toronto Real Estate Board released the Monthly Resale Housing Market Figures. The report confirms what I am experiencing on the ground. Essentially properly marketed properties that are priced correctly continue to sell. There is unquestionably less buyer traffic and it is taking longer to sell properties. However anyone who needs to sell - will sell - by hiring the right realtor, who implements a full marketing program and by being realistic about the price.
This is where the news is good. While prices are down from this years highs of March / Arpil and sales volumes are down 21% compared to October 2009, year over year prices on average are up 5% from October. At the end of the day the steam is out of the market, which in my view helps mitigate the risk of a bubble bursting, yet prices are holding because the market is in balance and prices remain relatively affordable.
This is where the news is good. While prices are down from this years highs of March / Arpil and sales volumes are down 21% compared to October 2009, year over year prices on average are up 5% from October. At the end of the day the steam is out of the market, which in my view helps mitigate the risk of a bubble bursting, yet prices are holding because the market is in balance and prices remain relatively affordable.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Competition Crisis? Real Estate Fee's set to plunge?
Are consumers about to experience an increase in competition, service options and a reduction in fees for selling their homes? For some time now the Competition Bureau and the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) have been discussing concerns the Bureau has about a perceived lack of competition in the Canadian Real Estate Market Place. Recently the Competition Bureau (Announcement) and CREA (CREA NEWS) announced an agreement in principle that if ratified by CREA members, may address the Competition Bureau's concerns.
So what does this mean for consumers? The idea is that new rules will enable Realtors the opportunity to offer a broader range of service options and fee structures enabling
consumers to save money when selling their houses. Depending on who you are listening to and choose to believe, some would suggest there already is a menu of options and fee structures available to consumers - think for sale by owner. For sale by owner services and low fee brokerages versus full service brokerages. Others would have us believe that all Realtors are in cahoots to overcharge consumers for doing next to nothing, selling their homes as fast as we can to then collect a big cheque... Then we can all go out and drive Mercedes and BMW's, eat at expensive restaurants and generally live the high life with little effort - no muss - no fuss... Oh if only it were that easy!
I'll leave it to others to decide whether there is in fact enough choice and competition in the market place. What I do know is that the menu of options and range of fees will only be provided if they are economically viable. If someone launches a business model and their business expenses are not covered by the income, and they can't draw a salary to pay their personal bills, eventually they will go broke and that model will disappear. More on that in a minute, first let's look at the current dynamics...
Currently in the GTA I compete directly with almost 30,000 registered sales representatives and brokers. (29,913 Toronto Real Estate Board members in July 2010) We compete directly against one another to represent buyers and sellers. In 2009 there were a total of 87,308 transactions which is 174,616 buyers and sellers represented by a sales representative or broker. Divide that by the number of Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) members and you discover that if each of us did exactly the same number of transactions we would serve 5.83 clients per year.
The revenue this generates based on the average size of transaction and average fees would not pay 50% of my business expenses for this past year. Realistically if I can't pay my basic expenses (car - not a BMW or Mercedes by the way), cell phone, Internet, marketing materials for myself and the homes I am selling, professional fees (RECO, TREB, OREA, CREA dues), insurance, technology, broker fees etc., etc.) I certainly cannot draw a salary or pay my family's bills - in other words I would have to seek another way to support my family and would no longer work as a Real Estate Broker.
Now consider that last year I served 44 buyers and sellers - a lot more than my allotted share of 5.8 clients - and that other top sales representatives and brokers like myself serve this many clients and some a lot more. This of course means there are a lot of Realtors out there that are not representing anyone and or so few that they are starving. So why are some successful and others not? Presumably it's like any business - we offer service in exchange for fees and people see the value in these services and are happy with the work we do. They tell others who then retain our services as well.
Now not all of us offer the same services or charge the same prices. Depending on what a consumer is looking for they will seek the services of different service providers. Some choose to try and sell privately, others work to sell privately but pay a fee to a company to offer basic services. Or they will choose a low service, low fee real estate brokerage, while others will pay higher fees for a full service real estate brokerage.
At the end of the day you get what you pay for - low cost means a lot more work for the seller and they have to rely on their own knowledge and skill set to get the job done. Paying a higher price means less work for the consumer and more professional help and guidance. The key of course is you should only agree to pay the higher price if in fact you choose a competent, hard working and honest professional. Consumers must take responsibility for choosing their professional and ensuring they are in fact competent and experienced enough to do the job.
So what changes if there is a settlement that is accepted by both parties? The big change appears to be that we will be able to provide the sellers name and phone number in the MLS / Realtor.ca listing for properties thus cutting the listing agent out of the loop once the property is posted. So potentially sellers can pay a minimal fee for a sales representative or real estate broker to post their property on the MLS and then the seller does absolutely everything else.
This change I suppose is founded on the suggestion that we have an unfair competitive advantage due to our access to the Multiple Listing Service or Realtor.ca. If this were the case why do so many Sales Representatives not sell houses or perhaps no more than a small handful a year. They have access but not a thriving business. Alternatively why do some listed homes never sell? Lets assume just anyone can load their house onto MLS / Realtor.ca. The reality is if you don't prepare the home correctly, market it properly, disclose latent defects as required by law, and negotiate effectively - you may well sell your home, but realistically it will be for a lot less than if all of the above were done well. Further the seller runs the risk of being sued for not properly disclosing latent defects if there were some and they weren't properly disclosed. Alternatively you may not sell at all as your listing doesn't offer the value you are seeking. Many homes listed on MLS don't sell - and this is with a Sales Representative or Real Estate Broker. A true real estate professional brings a lot more to the table than throwing a house up on MLS and Realtor.ca.
Should I as a Real Estate Broker be alarmed by such a change? Will this revolutionize our industry? Are my professional fees going to plummet as a result?
In the short term I have no doubt additional options and fee structures will emerge, some of these may even survive if the value proposition is sufficient and a large enough market exists to sustain them.
The reality is that Buying and Selling a home is a very complicated transaction, one where many things can and do go wrong, there are many opportunities to lose a lot of money and/or to be sued or feel the need to sue to seek damages. When I sold my own home I had a colleague negotiate the deal for me. Do I have so little faith in my own abilities? Of course not, rather it was my home and I recognized being too close to the sale would not represent my interests well. As an expert I recognize what is at stake and knew I would be better off with someone I trusted acting as the front person in negotiations. I staged the home, prepared and implemented the marketing and sales program but stepped back on the final step to protect myself and my family's interests.
In my fifth year as a realtor having been involved in over 150 individual transactions I now consider myself a knowledgeable expert in my field. The vast majority of individuals will purchase or sell 1, 2 perhaps 3 homes in their lifetime - the idea that the average person has the knowledge or skill to represent themselves, is frankly a bit frightening. The reality is that the knowledge and skills I brought to the table on transaction #1 was a lot less than I bring to the table today. Further I continue to learn and to grow and I have new experiences and encounter unique situations. These deepen my understanding and experience. People representing themselves don't and can't have the benefit of this experience and the attendant knowledge.
By all means having the option is fine and some may well have the knowledge and capabilities to represent themselves. If they can save on fees and not get burned - well awesome! Most people I fear do not have the knowledge and capabilities. Do you have the marketing and sales background to prepare a house for sale to maximize value? Do you have the experience in negotiations or understand what a latent defect is and why you must disclose it to a prospective buyer? If you do know, do you understand how best to disclose it to minimize the harm and cost to you? Do you understand market value and know what a fair price is for the property you wish to buy? Or sell? Do you understand the risk of a termite infestation and the importance of a home inspection and the need to be cautious regarding knob and tube wiring, old asbestos wrapped pipes, or a wet basement? At the end of the day rather than worry about the cost of the fees (within reason) consider what value is delivered, how much more will your home sell for as a result of an experts guidance, advice and service. Further while buyers don't pay our fees, the seller does, buyers guided by a real estate expert will select a more suitable home to their means and needs and should pay a lower price resulting from expert negotiation and understanding of value.
So to answer my earlier questions no I am not concerned (for myself) about the change, though I fear some will get burned on what is the biggest purchase and /or sale of their lives. I believe there will be some new options offered, however it's unclear that the market will sustain these. If the market does sustain them then presumably it's because they effectively serve the needs of a specific market segment. I don't believe this will revolutionize our market as the services of real estate experts will still be needed and sought by those who understand our value proposition. And finally I don't believe the fees I charge will plummet as I understand the value of the services I deliver and believe there will always be consumers willing to pay for superior service and results.
So what does this mean for consumers? The idea is that new rules will enable Realtors the opportunity to offer a broader range of service options and fee structures enabling
consumers to save money when selling their houses. Depending on who you are listening to and choose to believe, some would suggest there already is a menu of options and fee structures available to consumers - think for sale by owner. For sale by owner services and low fee brokerages versus full service brokerages. Others would have us believe that all Realtors are in cahoots to overcharge consumers for doing next to nothing, selling their homes as fast as we can to then collect a big cheque... Then we can all go out and drive Mercedes and BMW's, eat at expensive restaurants and generally live the high life with little effort - no muss - no fuss... Oh if only it were that easy!
I'll leave it to others to decide whether there is in fact enough choice and competition in the market place. What I do know is that the menu of options and range of fees will only be provided if they are economically viable. If someone launches a business model and their business expenses are not covered by the income, and they can't draw a salary to pay their personal bills, eventually they will go broke and that model will disappear. More on that in a minute, first let's look at the current dynamics...Currently in the GTA I compete directly with almost 30,000 registered sales representatives and brokers. (29,913 Toronto Real Estate Board members in July 2010) We compete directly against one another to represent buyers and sellers. In 2009 there were a total of 87,308 transactions which is 174,616 buyers and sellers represented by a sales representative or broker. Divide that by the number of Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) members and you discover that if each of us did exactly the same number of transactions we would serve 5.83 clients per year.
The revenue this generates based on the average size of transaction and average fees would not pay 50% of my business expenses for this past year. Realistically if I can't pay my basic expenses (car - not a BMW or Mercedes by the way), cell phone, Internet, marketing materials for myself and the homes I am selling, professional fees (RECO, TREB, OREA, CREA dues), insurance, technology, broker fees etc., etc.) I certainly cannot draw a salary or pay my family's bills - in other words I would have to seek another way to support my family and would no longer work as a Real Estate Broker.
Now consider that last year I served 44 buyers and sellers - a lot more than my allotted share of 5.8 clients - and that other top sales representatives and brokers like myself serve this many clients and some a lot more. This of course means there are a lot of Realtors out there that are not representing anyone and or so few that they are starving. So why are some successful and others not? Presumably it's like any business - we offer service in exchange for fees and people see the value in these services and are happy with the work we do. They tell others who then retain our services as well.
Now not all of us offer the same services or charge the same prices. Depending on what a consumer is looking for they will seek the services of different service providers. Some choose to try and sell privately, others work to sell privately but pay a fee to a company to offer basic services. Or they will choose a low service, low fee real estate brokerage, while others will pay higher fees for a full service real estate brokerage.
At the end of the day you get what you pay for - low cost means a lot more work for the seller and they have to rely on their own knowledge and skill set to get the job done. Paying a higher price means less work for the consumer and more professional help and guidance. The key of course is you should only agree to pay the higher price if in fact you choose a competent, hard working and honest professional. Consumers must take responsibility for choosing their professional and ensuring they are in fact competent and experienced enough to do the job.
So what changes if there is a settlement that is accepted by both parties? The big change appears to be that we will be able to provide the sellers name and phone number in the MLS / Realtor.ca listing for properties thus cutting the listing agent out of the loop once the property is posted. So potentially sellers can pay a minimal fee for a sales representative or real estate broker to post their property on the MLS and then the seller does absolutely everything else.
This change I suppose is founded on the suggestion that we have an unfair competitive advantage due to our access to the Multiple Listing Service or Realtor.ca. If this were the case why do so many Sales Representatives not sell houses or perhaps no more than a small handful a year. They have access but not a thriving business. Alternatively why do some listed homes never sell? Lets assume just anyone can load their house onto MLS / Realtor.ca. The reality is if you don't prepare the home correctly, market it properly, disclose latent defects as required by law, and negotiate effectively - you may well sell your home, but realistically it will be for a lot less than if all of the above were done well. Further the seller runs the risk of being sued for not properly disclosing latent defects if there were some and they weren't properly disclosed. Alternatively you may not sell at all as your listing doesn't offer the value you are seeking. Many homes listed on MLS don't sell - and this is with a Sales Representative or Real Estate Broker. A true real estate professional brings a lot more to the table than throwing a house up on MLS and Realtor.ca.
Should I as a Real Estate Broker be alarmed by such a change? Will this revolutionize our industry? Are my professional fees going to plummet as a result?
In the short term I have no doubt additional options and fee structures will emerge, some of these may even survive if the value proposition is sufficient and a large enough market exists to sustain them.
The reality is that Buying and Selling a home is a very complicated transaction, one where many things can and do go wrong, there are many opportunities to lose a lot of money and/or to be sued or feel the need to sue to seek damages. When I sold my own home I had a colleague negotiate the deal for me. Do I have so little faith in my own abilities? Of course not, rather it was my home and I recognized being too close to the sale would not represent my interests well. As an expert I recognize what is at stake and knew I would be better off with someone I trusted acting as the front person in negotiations. I staged the home, prepared and implemented the marketing and sales program but stepped back on the final step to protect myself and my family's interests.
In my fifth year as a realtor having been involved in over 150 individual transactions I now consider myself a knowledgeable expert in my field. The vast majority of individuals will purchase or sell 1, 2 perhaps 3 homes in their lifetime - the idea that the average person has the knowledge or skill to represent themselves, is frankly a bit frightening. The reality is that the knowledge and skills I brought to the table on transaction #1 was a lot less than I bring to the table today. Further I continue to learn and to grow and I have new experiences and encounter unique situations. These deepen my understanding and experience. People representing themselves don't and can't have the benefit of this experience and the attendant knowledge.
By all means having the option is fine and some may well have the knowledge and capabilities to represent themselves. If they can save on fees and not get burned - well awesome! Most people I fear do not have the knowledge and capabilities. Do you have the marketing and sales background to prepare a house for sale to maximize value? Do you have the experience in negotiations or understand what a latent defect is and why you must disclose it to a prospective buyer? If you do know, do you understand how best to disclose it to minimize the harm and cost to you? Do you understand market value and know what a fair price is for the property you wish to buy? Or sell? Do you understand the risk of a termite infestation and the importance of a home inspection and the need to be cautious regarding knob and tube wiring, old asbestos wrapped pipes, or a wet basement? At the end of the day rather than worry about the cost of the fees (within reason) consider what value is delivered, how much more will your home sell for as a result of an experts guidance, advice and service. Further while buyers don't pay our fees, the seller does, buyers guided by a real estate expert will select a more suitable home to their means and needs and should pay a lower price resulting from expert negotiation and understanding of value.
So to answer my earlier questions no I am not concerned (for myself) about the change, though I fear some will get burned on what is the biggest purchase and /or sale of their lives. I believe there will be some new options offered, however it's unclear that the market will sustain these. If the market does sustain them then presumably it's because they effectively serve the needs of a specific market segment. I don't believe this will revolutionize our market as the services of real estate experts will still be needed and sought by those who understand our value proposition. And finally I don't believe the fees I charge will plummet as I understand the value of the services I deliver and believe there will always be consumers willing to pay for superior service and results.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Attention Buyers - Market update
With the release of September's market stats by the Toronto Real Estate Board we can better understand what the Fall is going to look like this year. Generally the market fared well. Admittedly things seem rather lack lustre based on the standard we have become accustomed to with properties selling like wild fire and bidding wars every where we look. As such it is easy for the Doom and Gloom crowd to suggest the sky is falling.
However in the context of a more "normal" market - the good properties professionally presented and well marketed continue to sell. They may not be selling in seven days for over asking, but they are selling. Certainly the first lesson from the data is it's generally not advisable to list low and seek to push the price higher, rather listing a little higher with room to negotiate would be more prudent.
So what do the stats tells us - Prices are up 5% from this time last year and sales volumes are down 23%. The drop in sales volumes might seem alarming but they are being compared to record breaking months in the market. As mentioned in earlier posts a slow down in sales in my view is healthy for the market and will help sustain the market over time. While prices are up from one year ago and in many Toronto Real Estate Board Districts prices are up from the average prices in January and February. They have however come down modestly from the market highs in March and April.
Here is a chart from District E3 that shows the average selling price by month - the chart included data for 2008, 2009 and 2010.
However in the context of a more "normal" market - the good properties professionally presented and well marketed continue to sell. They may not be selling in seven days for over asking, but they are selling. Certainly the first lesson from the data is it's generally not advisable to list low and seek to push the price higher, rather listing a little higher with room to negotiate would be more prudent.
So what do the stats tells us - Prices are up 5% from this time last year and sales volumes are down 23%. The drop in sales volumes might seem alarming but they are being compared to record breaking months in the market. As mentioned in earlier posts a slow down in sales in my view is healthy for the market and will help sustain the market over time. While prices are up from one year ago and in many Toronto Real Estate Board Districts prices are up from the average prices in January and February. They have however come down modestly from the market highs in March and April.
Here is a chart from District E3 that shows the average selling price by month - the chart included data for 2008, 2009 and 2010.So where to from here? I don't of course have a crystal ball so like any prognosticator I can only predict based on the data available and what I am seeing and hearing on the ground in the market. My sense is that through the Fall period buyers will be more cautious and fewer in number, that properties will take longer to sell, and that properties that don't show well, are poorly marketed or even slightly overpriced will sit and be more difficult to sell. I also expect that prices will pull back a bit more, perhaps giving up the gains we had in the first part of the year.
At the end of the day I expect a balanced and more modest Fall - those who are buying will be able to get better value for their money. In fact I would suggest that this Fall is an excellent buying opportunity. For one you can likely avoid competition, secondly you will get more for your money and third there is more choice and finally interest remains near historic lows. Whether you are moving up or buying for the first time now is a great time to go. If you are looking to downsize it's more tricky to know whether to wait or do it now. As always I'm glad to speak to anyone about their very particular situation and help to explore the options and the benefits and risks associated with the different choices.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
